Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Paper 2: Things Fall Apart

To what extent has an awareness of context enriched or enhanced your understanding of Things Fall Apart?

The way I understood Things Fall Apart changed a lot after the class developed an understanding of the context. This is due to the highly specific aims of the text – author Chinua Achebe was writing against the colonial oppressors with the aim of changing the way Nigerians (and other colonized cultures) saw their histories. With this understanding of context in mind, many of the decisions Achebe made regarding what aspects of Igbo culture to include and which to exclude made more sense. In this essay, I will be exploring examples of how an understanding of context and culture has furthered the depth at which we understand the text.

One of the most apparent examples of this is the debate concerning the text’s sexist connotations. On a casual reading without additional cultural context, it appears as if Things Fall Apart is very sexist – wife beating is accepted as a normal part of society, men can take more than one wife, and husbands are expected to have “control” over their households.

After reading essays on the Igbo cultural background, however, we learn of the existence of women’s groups like the “Umuada” or daughters of the clan. These groups controlled the “civil and familial spheres of influence”, and contained powerful women who even had the power to take titles and (in some tribes) marry other women. This is unsurprising if we consider that the central cultural axiom of Igbo life is Balance. Although this disparity between the way Igbo culture is portrayed by Achebe and the way it actually was may be even more infuriating at first, upon greater consideration it deepens the personal connections we form to the text.

In Rhonda Cobham’s essay Problems of Gender and History in the teaching of Things Fall Apart, she proposes that Achebe purposefully leaves out the traditional power that Igbo women had because it does not fit our Western culture. While the idea that Achebe was trying to “fit” western culture seems absurd at first, it makes more sense when considering the context of the novel. Things Fall Apart was written in 1958, with the aim of giving the world a traditional African narrative and character to identify with. One of the devices Achebe used to make sure we identified with Okonkwo is reducing the disparity between Western and African culture and customs.

Apart from not giving autonomous women’s societies more power, Achebe also focuses on the seemingly ‘polygamous’ relationship of Okonkwo and Ekwefi by not describing in as much detail the love between Okonkwo and his other two wives. This is strengthened when we realize that in the majority of instances where Okonkwo shows caring emotion, Ezinma and Ekwefi are involved (e.g. when Okonkwo follows Ekwefi to the Oracle; when we learn of his worry before this event; and when he prepares medicine to cure Ezinma’s fever). Through this, the difference between these cultures seems smaller, and allows the non-African audience another potential facet to identify with.

In the same vein, Achebe excluded some realistic actions that actual Igbo women could have taken during the course of the novel. For example, in the case of the wife-beating Uzowulu, the earlier mentioned Umuada (or daughters of the clan) could have organized a “sexual strike” until his wife got the justice she deserved. Cases like these are unheard of in the west, however, and so their exclusion give the non-African readers a structure that they can identify with. By doing so, Achebe is able to focus on building cultural similarities in Part One of the novel, which play a big role in allowing the audience to identify with Okonkwo when Igbo society falls apart in Part Two.

This decision of his also helps the audience center on the focal point of the text: the reality of colonization. If Igbo culture had been described in all it’s glory, it’s likely that many other issues would have been raised (e.g. sexism), not pertaining to Achebe’s original plan. We see him exercising his right as an author to create (to a certain extent) his own version of Umuofia, which is ideal for telling his story.

This idea that Achebe’s Umuofia is just one interpretation of an African village of many others that could exist also introduces the readers to the fact that “there is no truly objective, unbiased version of traditional life” (Cobham). The observer effect comes into play – once the village is being recorded it’s reality has been affected by the person recording it. This realization is one that goes beyond just Things Fall Apart, enriching our understanding of any texts we may read in the future (especially those relating to traditional life).

A cultural concept that enriched my understanding of the text was that of Balance. In the essays we read, a lot of emphasis was placed on how much the Igbo value Balance in all forms – seen in the novel, for example, when the male is the ‘lead’ of the household but the concept of ‘Nneka’, or mother being supreme, also exists.

This understanding of the Igbo culture sheds light on why Okonkwo is so conflicted – he interprets his own tribe’s values as being direct and clear-cut, whereas in reality there are often two sides to the same coin. Okonkwo associates masculinity solely with courage and strength, and he fails to realize the complex system of morals encompassing both compassion and strength that the Igbo value. One example of this is in the case of Ndule and Ozeomena, where Okonkwo’s counterpart Obierika positively recognizes their inseparability while Okonkwo questions the masculinity of Ndule.

This concept of balance also helps us understand the wider narrative that Achebe is weaving – that of the intertwining western and African stories. This is done very interestingly in Part One, where Achebe tells a western story structure with African characters and cultural practices. For example, in the biblical parallels he includes relating the Okonkwo-Nwoye dynamic to Abraham and Isaac, he balances Christian and Igbo values by showing their similarities. The earlier discussed selectivity that Achebe employs when discussing Igbo women also elaborates to the concept of balance: we see an Umuofia that is closer to our cultural practices and so are more likely to understand it better.

In conclusion, the increased awareness of context (relating to place, agenda, and time) have greatly strengthened our understanding of the many layers of Things Fall Apart. On hindsight, these contexts are crucial to a full comprehension of the many subtleties of the text, and are especially relevant when making sure readers don’t make sweeping judgmental statements on Igbo culture. 

9 comments:

  1. Wow! I was really impressed on your level of analysis for Things Fall Apart. I particularly enjoyed your commentary on the theme of balance in the novel.

    In today's class, we were given a quote by Walter Rodney to analyze which said that "Colonial education was education for subordination, exploitation, the creation of mental confusion". I noticed a striking similarity between this quote and your analysis of the "Balance" in Igbo culture.

    In your 3rd-to-last paragraph, you claim that Okonkwo was conflicted internally. Also, in today's class we discussed how many individuals - especially youth - were unsure of their identity. Do you think that the colonizers knew of this balance, and that one of their goals would have been to break the balance and cause this "mental confusion" in the Igbo culture and people?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment, Sohail! You raised an interesting point about the colonizers knowing about this element of balance in Igbo culture. Personally, I don't think they would have achieved an understanding of balance similar to what we have. As seen in the last sentence of the book, the way the District Commissioner dismisses Okonkwo proves that western society had a very minimal understanding of Igbo culture.
      However, when thinking of balance in terms of the balance of power and education, I think the colonizers were definitely aware of it and using it to their advantage. Rodney's quote evidences the bias in colonial "education". As we see in the novel, the colonizers target the religious system first, by providing a replacement. This depicts them breaking the balance within the culture, especially in Igboland where education is founded in faith. The fact that they targeted religion first shows an awareness of where that would lead - and so implies that they understood this balance, but only in a more literal sense (and away from Igbo core values). Interesting insight!

      Delete
  2. I greatly enjoyed your alternate perspective concerning the story's context and your tie in of the many essays we read in regards to the novel. In particular an argument that stood most out to me was that of Achebe's selective representation of his society in an effort to strike a balance between the message he hoped to convey and an authentic representation of his historical society.
    Would you argue that in portraying the Ibo people in such a manner that Achebe not only hoped to rectify the global impression of his people but also tackle domestic issues, such as feminism and violence against women, that had long gone under checked?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comment, Rohan!! I would agree that Achebe's specific representation serves to change the global impression of his people. This is especially seen in how he includes more western elements that non-African readers identify with.
      Your comment on Achebe's tackling domestic issues has interesting implications. While it seems like that's what he was doing by portraying the stance of women in a more negative light than reality, it's hard to argue this point since the book is based heavily on colonizers and the idea of the 'outsider'. Therefore while this viewpoint could be argued, I still think Achebe's central goal was to tell an African story that we could relate to - and the problems (such as sexism) within the culture prove that the Igbo are flawed, just like any real culture.

      Delete
  3. I really enjoyed reading your blog post, Athena. Do you believe that Achebe's selective representation of the Ibo culture's Western aspects limits the function of resistance towards his African audience? I understood how the novel was significant for Western readers but am unsure as to how this would influence those already familiar with the Ibo culture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmm, interesting point... Seeing as how Achebe's work was one of the first modern African novels to reach a global audience, I think the actual representation of Igbo culture through one of their own voices would eclipse some of these disparities in representation.

      Additionally, the essays we read concerned Igbo culture in general, which varied over all the tribes that considered themselves Igbo. Therefore since Umuofia is a fictional village, the decisions Achebe made may have been accepted by Igbo readers as it mostly does stay true to their culture. Umuofia may realistically just not have had those concepts.

      Keeping these points in mind, we can conclude that these cultural choices would add an extra layer of meaning for people familiar with Igbo culture. Hopefully they'll see the necessity in choosing these elements to create Umuofia, the perfect place for Achebe's story. I think it would still serve as resistance, because the overall representation of Igbo culture is not erroneous. Thanks for the thought provoking comment!

      Delete
  4. Looks like you have some questions waiting Athena.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That was a great blogpost! You covered the theme's you treated in such detail that it's hard to come up with a question of something that remained unclear. Great job dealing with the theme of balance as well, I had never actually considered it to have so much preponderance in the novel, but now I clearly see where the connection is. Do you think it might be possible that imbalance is also portrayed in the novel? Maybe Okonkwo's downfall was a result of his lack of balance between his masculinity and femininity. On the other hand, character's like Obierika and Ogbuefi Ezeudo are considered to be respected men in Umuofia, but also possess some of the "femininity" in them, meaning that they're not all brawn, unlike Okonkwo. Any thoughts on that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment, Carlos. I agree that a balance in the masculinity-femininity dichotomy is instrumental in explaining why certain characters seem so in-phase with Igbo culture and others (like Okonkwo) eventually fall to pieces under it. However, while a character like Obierika is meant to be "balanced", we still see evidence of him questioning his own society (Chapter 13, last passage). This could be an explanation of why Igbo culture falls apart - even those we seem to understand it don't really.....

      Delete